Hirsch v. Olmesdahl
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment, rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew-York, ninth district, borough of Manhattan.
1Per curiam
The facts in this ease are substantially conceded. The plaintiff verbally leased certain premises, to the defendant, *758to be used as a machine shop, for a term ending January 31, 1902, at the sum of sixty-six dollars and sixty-six cents per month, agreeing at the same time to furnish defendant with a certain amount of steam power to run defendant’s machinery.
The accrued rent for which this action was brought, amounted to the sum of $266.64 less the sum of $61.58 paid on account and the plaintiff sued to recover the balance, $205.08. The defense was a general denial and a counterclaim for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Durant Land Improvement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Ely v. SpieroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898