Legal Opinion
In Re Castello
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 7, 1989No. 17-61999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY L. HESS, Jr., Chief Judge.
The principal issue in this case was whether the plan had been filed in good faith and whether it was proper for the court to have entered the order of confirmation. The creditor appeared by his attorney, B. Gil Sharp, of Hood River, Oregon, and the debtor appeared by his attorney, Todd Trierweiler, of Portland, Oregon.
The debtor’s plan dated November 9, 1988, provides that the debtor will pay to the trustee $125 per month. From such payments, the trustee will pay the expenses of administration, the debts entitled to priority and 100% of the debtor’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Lawrence Tractor Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Khalil and Shahin Chinichian, Debtors. Khalil and Shahin Chinichian v. Attilio CampolongoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Warren (In Re Warren)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re BarnesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re SeldenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1990
- In re CastelloUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1991