Legal Opinion
Telefest, Inc. v. Vu-TV, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 6, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-694PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, District Judge.
The question before the court is whether a security agreement executed on May 6, 1983 for the benefit of intervenor Manufacturers Hanover Trust (“MHT”) by defendant VU-TV, Inc. (“VU-TV”) and by the company of which VU-TV is a wholly-owned subsidiary, CATV Products, Inc. (“CATV”), constituted a fraudulent conveyance within the meaning of the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act (“UFCA”), as adopted by New Jersey, 25 N.J.S.A. 2-7 through 2-19 (“NJFCA”). If that conveyance was fraudulent, MHT will be impaired to the extent of the fraud in asserting what is otherwise a…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Meyer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In Re Roco Corporation, D/B/A Standard Supply Company, Debtor. Edward Consove v. Avram CohenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Klein v. TabatchnickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Kaufman v. TredwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- R. Anthony Dubay v. Everette H. Williams, Everette H. Williams v. Rose City Development Co., Inc., Robert J. Davis v. Everette H. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- HBE Leasing Corp. v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- In the Matter of Xonics Photochemical, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Mitsui and Company (u.s.a.), IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Tabor Court Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- In Re Image Worldwide, Ltd., Debtor. David P. Leibowitz, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Parkway Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Joseph Edelson and Harriet Edelson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.