Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2013No. 2009-CT-00669-SCTPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

RANDOLPH, Presiding Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Carlos Taylor appealed his sentence of life without parole, claiming that “the trial court abused [its] discretion in sentencing Taylor under Miss.Code Ann. Section 99-19-83, as the prosecution failed to prove all essential elements under the statute.” The Court of Appeals affirmed. Taylor v. State, 122 So.3d 742 (Miss.Ct.App.2011). We granted Taylor’s petition for writ of certiorari. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by sentencing Taylor under Section 99-19-83. Accordingly, we affirm Taylor’s sentence…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Collins v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Phillips v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  3. McIlwain v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Farris v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hardy v. BrockMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Conner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Courtney R. Logan v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  3. Allen M. Russell a/k/a Russell Allen v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Conner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Courtney R. Logan v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API