Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Lands in City of Newark, N. J., Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 15, 1950No. 9932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

Dissatisfaction with the amount of compensation awarded in the court below as “just” for the taking of a leasehold by the United States is the source of this appeal. The only issue raised is whether the learned trial judge applied the evidence submitted to him in such a way as to have commited reversible error.

On February 13, 1946, the United States, exercising its sovereignty and pursuant to 40 U.S.C.A. § 258a, upon a Declaration of Taking and deposit of $650,000, condemned the title in fee simple to the office building known as the Globe Indemnity Building at 20…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pueblo v. Sociedad McCormickSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1956
  2. State v. Heslar, Extrx.Indiana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. United States v. 15.3 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in the City of ScrantonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. United States v. 425,031 Square Feet of Land, Jersey City, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  5. State ex rel. Department of Highways v. CampbellNevada Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API