Legal Opinion

Garnes v. The Hartford Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 26, 2024No. 1:22-cv-03406Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------x MARK GARNES, Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. 22-CV-3406 (RPK) (TAM) THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------x RACHEL P. KOVNER, United States District Judge: Magistrate Judge Merkl’s report and recommendation (“R. & R.”) recommending that the amended complaint be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is adopted in full. BACKGROUND Pro se plaintiff Mark Garnes brought this action…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Fred Traguth and Otto Handtke, Individually and Doing Business as Dance Motion Press v. D'LeLa ZuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Fred Snow, Marcus Snow, Rahad RossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API