Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. Duran
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 28, 1952No. 12434, 12441PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
The question here presented is, which of two groups of claimants should be protected in their offices during the pendency of an election contest.
Two appeals are before us and both will be considered in a single opinion. Appellant Manuel Gonzales, Jr., and others are the duly elected and qualified trustees of the Grulla Independent School District. Appellee Efrain A. Duran and others are the duly elected and qualified trustees of the Rio Grande City Independent School District. On March 29, 1952, separate elections were conducted in the Grulla Dis trict and the Rio Grande City…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State ex rel. Jones v. OatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- King's Estate v. School Trustees of Willacy CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Callaghan v. TobinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Bowen v. Board of School Trustees of Panola CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Callaghan v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stockwell v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Gonzalez v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Perez v. McHazlettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1987
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.