Legal Opinion

Baltas v. Fitzgerald

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 14, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00587Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JOE BALTAS, : Plaintiff, : : v. : Case No. 3:21cv587(MPS) : B. FITZGERALD, ET AL., : Defendants. : RULINGS ON MOTION TO DEEM FAUCHER’S RESPONSES ADMITTED [ECF No. 46] MOTION FOR SPOLIATION SANCTIONS [ECF No. 48] In this action, Plaintiff Joe Baltas asserts claims for damages based on constitutional violations that allegedly arose during his confinement at Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Center in 2018. Compl., ECF No. 1. Specifically, the Court permitted Plaintiff to proceed on his claims of: Eighth Amendment violations based on isolating…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. Residential Funding Corporation v. Degeorge Financial Corp., Degeorge Home Alliance, Inc. And Degeorge Capital CorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Chin v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API