Legal Opinion

Hollander v. Hollander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1973PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for wrongfully procuring assets of a decedent, defendant Arthur Hollander appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 20, 1972, which denied his motion to' dismiss the complaint for lack Of jurisdiction over tile subject matter. Order modified by (1) striking the words “in all respects ” which appear after the decretal provision that the motion is denied and (2) adding thereto a provision ordering that the case is transferred to the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, this case…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Burmax Co. v. B & S Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Gaentner v. BenkovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Peekskill Community Hospital v. SayresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Nichols v. KrugerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Benjamin v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API