Legal Opinion
Long v. Long
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 2005No. 04-CA-938PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
|,SOL GOTHARD, Judge.
Defendant, Jeffery Long, appeals a decision of the trial court that cast him in judgment to his mother, plaintiff Sharon Grimillion Long, for $93,722.54 plus interest and attorney fees as a result of two promissory notes. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
This matter began with the filing of a petition entitled “Suit on Note” by Sharon Long in which she asserts that her son, Jeffery Long, is indebted to her for $93,722.54 as a result of non-payment on two promissory notes. Both notes are dated October 9, 2002, in the amounts of $30,669.35 and $68,000.00 respectively. As…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Lirette v. State Farm Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Touchard v. Slemco Electric FoundationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hancock Bank of Louisiana v. C & O Enterprises, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Richardson Wholesale, LLC v. DixLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017