Legal Opinion

Foothill Presbyterian Hospital v. Shalala

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 13, 1998No. 97-55335PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:

At issue in this case is Foothill Presbyterian Hospital’s reimbursement from Medicare for inpatient hospital services for fiscal year 1983. The Hospital argues that the district court erred in holding that its 1992 request for an exception to its 1983 target rate limit under 42 U.S.C. § 1395ww(b)(4)(A) and 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(e) was untimely. Although the Hospital’s target rate limit was revised in the second revised notice of program reimbursement (“NPR”) in 1991, the revision was based solely on malpractice insurance costs and wholly unrelated to the Hospital’s…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. 58 soc.sec.rep.ser. 21, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6312, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8757 Foothill Presbyterian Hospital v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API