In re the Will of Jones
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Caveators’ first assignment of error is that the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict for propounders. Based on the then recent case of In re Will of Jarvis, 107 N.C. App. 34, 418 S.E.2d 520 (1992), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 334 N.C. 140, 430 S.E.2d 922 (1993), which allowed a Rule 50 directed verdict motion in caveat cases, the trial court granted a directed verdict in favor of propounders on the issues of undue influence and testamentary capacity. Rule 50(a), which governs a motion for directed verdict states that “[a] motion for directed verdict shall…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- In Re the Purported Will of AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- In Re the Will of KempSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marley v. GraperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- In Re Will of SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003