Legal Opinion

Harvey v. FINE PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 2, 1980No. 61002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Judge.

The appellant was injured while operating machinery in the course of his employment on the premises of the Sophie Mae Candy Corporation in Atlanta, for which he has been compensated in a workers’ compensation award. He now seeks damages from, among others, Fine Products Company, Inc., of Augusta, Georgia, as a third-party tortfeasor. This contention is based upon his assertion that Fine Products had employees on the premises. This appeal is from the grant of summary judgment to Fine Products. Held:

Appellant concedes, and indeed the evidence shows, that Sophie Mae is a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mull v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Beck v. Flint Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Crisp Regional Hospital, Inc. v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Brown v. Advantage Engineering, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1990
  4. Collins v. SHELLER-GLOBE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API