Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Pryor Oldsmobile/GMC Co. v. Tennessee Motor Vehicle Commission

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 10, 1990Published

1ConcurrenceKoch, Judge

I concur with the result reached by the majority. The Tennessee Motor Vehicle Commission cannot deny Pryor Oldsmobile permission to display and sell cars at a branch showroom simply because the showroom itself does not qualify as an “established place of business” pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-17-102(8) (1988).

I

Pryor Oldsmobile is a licensed motor vehicle dealer in good standing located in Memphis. In late 1986, it applied to the Tennessee Motor Vehicle Commission for permission to operate a branch showroom at the Mall of Memphis, approximately 1.5 miles from its primary place of business. *232…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neff v. Cherokee Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Oliver v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Parker-Harris Co. v. TateTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State v. HinsleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Roddy Manufacturing Co. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API