Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 15, 2008No. 3D08-76PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
994 So.2d 1131 (2008)
Chantal RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 3D08-76.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
January 15, 2008.
Paul Morris, Miami, for petitioner.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Heidi Milan Caballero, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before COPE and GREEN, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
2Per curiam
In the light of the state's candidand, we find, correctconfession of error in the trial court's determination, after an Arthur hearing, that the defendant had committed a non-bondable offense, the writ is granted and the cause remanded…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Shocki v. ArestyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
4Cited by1 opinion
- Shocki v. ArestyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008