Legal Opinion
Sause v. Ward
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 30, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal : 'Court of Appeals for Trumbull county.
1Opinion of the CourtPollock, J.
This action comes into this court on appeal. The plaintiff, James L. Sause, claims that he entered into a contract with the defendant Catherine Ward for the sale to him of a certain *447tract of real estate which is described in the petition; that upon demand she refused to convey this property to him as the contract required; and that afterwards she conveyed the property to her codefendant, said defendant accepting said deed with full knowledge of the equities of plaintiff. He asks that the defendants be required to reconvey the property to him.
On November 15, 1916, Catherine Ward was then the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Hopwood v. McCauslandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Barnes v. ReaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Western Securities Co. v. AtleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Bostwick v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ritchie v. CordrayOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Glick v. DolinOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Warner & Swasey Co. v. Ruster-HolzDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1941
- Midland Properties Co. v. Union Properties, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957
- Howick v. Lakewood Village Ltd., 10-08-20 (4-27-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009