Legal Opinion

Norton v. Hines

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1922Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

ARNOLD, J.

Both parties have submitted briefs on rehearing. Defendants’ additional brife is devoted chiefly to an argument that defendants were right in their original contentions, to-wit, that the contributory negligence of the wife should be imputed to- the husband by reason of the marital relation. No arguments are advanced, or principles of law enunciated which were not considered by this court on its former review of the case. Defendants repeatedly insist that this is a case of first impression in this State, but in this position, we cannot agree. We have before us the case of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hays v. HoganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  2. Moon v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. Munger v. City of SedaliaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Bright v. ThacherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Byerley v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API