DiPasquale Construction Corp. v. Zinnert
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the plaintiff’s motion for a disciplinary nonsuit of the defendants’ counterclaim because they did not file a substitute pleading after one count of their counterclaim and five special defenses were stricken pursuant to Practice Book § 157.1 The sole issue on appeal is whether Practice Book § 157 requires that a party file a substitute pleading when less than the entire pleading has been stricken. We hold that it does not.
The facts relevant to this appeal are not in dispute. The plaintiff filed a two count complaint alleging…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Nowak v. NowakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- City of Norwich v. SilverbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Royce v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reichert v. TRW, Inc., Cutting Tools Div.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Grieco v. PerrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997