Legal Opinion

DiPasquale Construction Corp. v. Zinnert

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 5, 1988No. 5649PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the plaintiff’s motion for a disciplinary nonsuit of the defendants’ counterclaim because they did not file a substitute pleading after one count of their counterclaim and five special defenses were stricken pursuant to Practice Book § 157.1 The sole issue on appeal is whether Practice Book § 157 requires that a party file a substitute pleading when less than the entire pleading has been stricken. We hold that it does not.

The facts relevant to this appeal are not in dispute. The plaintiff filed a two count complaint alleging…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Nowak v. NowakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. City of Norwich v. SilverbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. Royce v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reichert v. TRW, Inc., Cutting Tools Div.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Grieco v. PerrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API