Legal Opinion

Temple v. Martin Veneer Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1941No. 2210PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTT, Judge.

The plaintiffs are the father and mother of Lee Ora Temple, and they sue for compensation for 300 weeks on the basis of 65% of $14 per week, plus $250 medical expenses, $100 funeral expenses and $50 for contingent liability on account of an alleged accident and injury received by their son while working for the defendant company in 1937, which injury produced or aggravated a fatal disease resulting in the death of their said son. They allege that they were wholly dependent on his earnings for support.

The defendant denies that the deceased was ever injured or suffered an accident…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Causey v. Kansas City Bridge Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Butler v. Washington-Youree Hotel Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Laughlin v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fagan v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. Clifton v. ArnoldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Thomas v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Sims v. Brown Paper Industries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Stewart v. Herrin Transp. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API