Legal Opinion

Leighton v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 28, 1964PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves to strike defendant’s demand for a jury trial served more than three and a half years after the case has been at issue as a non jury matter. This action, wherein plaintiff seeks to recover a balance due for legal services rendered to the defendant, was commenced in February 1961. The defendant answered on March 15, 1961.1 It waived its right to trial by jury by failure to file a demand. The action remained in nonjury posture until July 16, 1964, when substituted attorneys for the defendant moved pursuant to Rule 13(f) of the Federal Rules of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moore Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  2. Alcoa S. S. Co., Inc. v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  3. Parissi v. Foley, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  4. Reeves v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
  5. E. H. Tate Co. v. Jiffy Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Walton v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Rosen v. DickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,342 William Dasho v. The Susquehanna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  4. Ex Parte Atlantis Development Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API