Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Perruccio

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 2, 1968No. File No. CV 9-655-2551PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDearington, J.

This action was brought on a common counts writ to recover the value of services rendered and materials furnished the defendants by the plaintiff in the installation of a septic tank system on property of the defendants as set forth in a bill of particulars. In their answer, the defendants deny the claim and by way of a counterclaim allege that the plaintiff failed to perform the work according to his agreement; that the installation was performed in an unworkmanlike manner; that the plaintiff broke his warranty of fitness; and that he did defective work and then abandoned it and it became…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chazen v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Wilkins v. G. Fox Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. Sasso v. AyotteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. De Santo v. BurkleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Avco Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API