Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Schott

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1959No. 8588PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action for specific performance of a contract, originating in the Common Pleas Court of Hamilton County, and appealed therefrom to this court on questions of both law and fact.

The alleged contract, of which .specific performance is sought, was one whereby the plaintiff agreed to buy and the defendants agreed to sell all the corporate stock of Southern Industries & Investment Company, the sole asset of which was, seemingly, the Enquirer Building. The subject matter of the negotiations was, therefore, in substance, the Enquirer Building, and all the parties so recognized it.

At the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Theiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Keller v. HoldermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Earle v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. Woods v. Fifth-Third Union Tr. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Bruce v. BishopSupreme Court of Vermont · 1870

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Genesco, Inc. v. Joint Council 13, United Shoe Workers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. Genesco, Inc. v. Joint Council 13, United Shoe WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  3. Kinko's Graphics Corp. v. TownsendDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API