Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Housing Authority

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 17, 2009No. 14, September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

We decide in this case whether the Housing Authority of Baltimore City (“HABC”) enjoys governmental immunity from suits in tort if it has exhausted the limits of its commercial insurance policy in payment of prior claims. The case comes to us from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the HABC, the respondent, in a lead paint action brought by the petitioner, Devonte A. Brooks (“Brooks”). The HABC argued that, under Maryland’s “Housing Authorities” law, Md.Code (1957, 2003 Repl.Vol.), Art. 44A, 1 as construed by Jackson v. Housing Opportunities Comm’n of Montgomery County, 289 Md. 118,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Katz v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Austin v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Evans v. Housing Auth. of City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Battle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sager v. Housing CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  2. Gomez v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Maryland Transportation Authority Police Lodge 34 v. Maryland Transportation AuthorityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Board of Education v. Beka Industries, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Chicago Title Insurance v. Mary B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API