Legal Opinion

Dear v. Weineke

California Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1892No. 14426PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This action was brought to recover certain taxes claimed to have been paid under duress, and which it is declared by the appellant were not collectible, by reason of the assessment being invalid.

The individual whose personal property was assessed ■gave a list of it in detail, as lie states in his complaint, the assessor, but that official did not list the property in detail, but made this entry in the assessment-book: 61 Value of personal property, exclusive of money and .solvent credits, $15,725.”

The complaint is demurred to as not stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. AddiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Savings & Loan Society v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. El Tejon Cattle Co. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Domenghini v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Hawley v. Los Angeles Creamery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API