Legal Opinion

Brown v. Houck

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1886Published

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, entered upon a verdict rendered at the IVIonroe Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Haight, J. :

In the spring of 1876, George W. Provost was elected collector of taxes for the town of Kush. He qualified and entered upon the discharge of his office, giving the usual official bond as town collector, signed by the plaintiffs as sureties. In December of that year the annual tax roll of the town, with warrant attached, was issued to him commanding him to collect the sum of $11,165.05 and pay the same over to the county treasurer. Of the sum collected by him as such collector he paid over to the treasurer all except the sum of $2,065, as to which sum he made default. Thereafter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wetmore v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Stephens v. . Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Segelken v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Fifth National Bank v. Village of Hyde ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. EdwardsNew York Supreme Court · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API