Legal Opinion

Unimin Corp. v. Gallo

North Carolina Business Court

Decided September 4, 2014No. 14-CVS-141PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Unimin Corp. v. Gallo, 2014 NCBC 43. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE MITCHELL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION 14 CVS 141 UNIMIN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR THOMAS GALLO, an individual, and PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION I-MINERALS USA, INC., an Idaho corporation, (REDACTED) Defendants. {1} THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Plaintiff Unimin Corporation’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Preliminary Injunction (the “P.I. Motion”) pursuant to Rule 65 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure (“N.C.R.C.P.”). Based…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. De La Concha of Hartford, Inc. v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Ridge Community Investors, Inc. v. BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Visionair, Inc. v. James & Colossus Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dsm Dyneema, LLC v. ThagardNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014
  2. RCR ENTERS., LLC v. McCALLNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API