Legal Opinion

Zweig v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided December 26, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward Goodell, J.

This case illustrates the point that although Lawrence v. Fox (20 N. Y. 268) is still alive and well, the classes of third-party beneficiaries, to which it is applicable are not without limitation.

The plaintiff is a physician, who rendered medical services to Martin Horne, while he was a patient at Beth Israel Hospital. His bill for the services he rendered was $1,105. Unfortunately, Martin Horne died while at the hospital, leaving behind both an unpaid hospital bill and an unpaid medical bill for Dr. Zweig’s services.

The decedent had been a member of the Building Service Employees Union…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Seaver v. RansomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. NN Investors Life Insurance Co v. CrossleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Harrison & Burrowes, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1976
  3. State v. New Hampshire Merchants InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API