Legal Opinion

Swearingen v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2013No. 20130063PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Matthew Swearingen appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Concluding the district court provided inadequate findings of fact and should have granted Swearingen’s request for a transcript of the post-conviction evidentiary hearing, we reverse and remand.

I

[¶ 2] Swearingen was charged with and found guilty of gross sexual imposition. He appealed the judgment, arguing there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s decision, which this Court summarily affirmed in State v. Swearingen, 2012 ND 6, 809 N.W.2d 838.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Owens v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. KranzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Phillips v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Swearingen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API