King v. . Barnes
New York Court of Appeals
Three appeals and three motions in this action were argued and disposed of together. As to the appeals the following is the mem. of the opinion: “First. The judgment of the Special Term entered on the 2d day of August, 1886, was an interlocutory judgment.
Read the full summary
Three appeals and three motions in this action were argued and disposed of together. As to the appeals the following is the mem. of the opinion: “First. The judgment of the Special Term entered on the 2d day of August, 1886, was an interlocutory judgment. It finally determined certain matters in controversy between the parties, but it ordered an accounting between them and appointed a referee for that purpose; and final judgment could not be entered until the accounting was had and report made. From that judgment the defendant, Barnes, appealed to the General Term, and he also served notice…
1Opinion of the Court
Earl, J.,
reads mem. disposing of the matters as follows:
1st. Appeal from General Term order, affirming interlocutory judgment, dismissed.
2d. Appeal from General Term order, reversing order of trial court and allowing amendment of complaint, dismissed.
3d. Appeal from General Term order, denying stay of proceedings, dismissed.
4th. Motion to amend return denied.
5th. Motion to consolidate appeals denic d.
6th. Motion to stay proceedings denied
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Sternbach v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Townsend v. . Van BuskirkNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- McKeown v. OfficerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Sternbach v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898