Legal Opinion

Chilton v. City of Huntsville

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 21, 1991No. 1900637PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Michael Patrick Chilton, appeals from a summary judgment for the defendant, the City of Huntsville, a municipal corporation d/b/a Huntsville Utilities ("the City"), in this action seeking to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the City's negligence in constructing and maintaining one of its power lines. We reverse and remand.

Chilton, an experienced billboard poster for Patrick Media Group, suffered an electrical burn when metal scaffolding he was using to erect a poster on an elevated, roadside billboard came into contact with an energized power line that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Central Alabama Elec. Co-Op. v. TapleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Fincher v. Robinson Bros. Lincoln-MercurySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Alabama Power Company v. MosleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Sullivan v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matthews v. ALABAMA AGR. AND MECHANICAL UNIV.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. City of Lanett v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Gulledge v. Brown & Root, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Morris v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Robertson v. Travelers InnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API