Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garibaldi v. Dietz

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided July 6, 1988No. CA 87-425Published

1DissentJohn E. Jennings, Judge

When the State seeks to terminate parental rights the probate court must first determine whether the parent is fit or unfit. Dietz v. Bevell, 276 Ark. 500, 637 S.W.2d 555 (1982). Only if the parent is found unfit does the court then address the issue of the best interest of the child. Bevell, supra. A finding of unfitness must be supported by specific findings of fact. Bush v. Dietz, 284 Ark. 191, 680 S.W.2d 704 (1984). The facts supporting a finding of unfitness must be shown by clear and convincing evidence. Bush, supra; A.B. v. Arkansas Social Services, 273 Ark. 261, 620 S. W.2d 271 (1981).

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bush v. DietzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. A. B. v. Arkansas Social ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Dietz v. BevillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API