Legal Opinion

Dustin v. Union Pacific Railroad

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1985No. 15731Published

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

This appeal comes to us from the granting of a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Union Pacific Railroad. The plaintiff, Donald Dustin, brought suit under the Federal Employer's Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. (FELA) to recover for back and knee injuries sustained during his employment with Union Pacific. The railroad moved for summary judgment based on a release of claims signed by Dustin. Dustin asserted the release was void for mutual mistake of fact. The district court found that there was insufficient evidence to support Dustin’s mutual mistake theory…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Huyck v. Hecla Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Graham v. Atchison. T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  5. Rodriguez v. DENVER AND RIOR GRANDE WESTERN R. CO.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API