Legal Opinion
Laur & Mack Contracting Co. v. Cienzo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 7, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. Defendants hired plaintiff and third-party plaintiff, Laur & Mack Contracting Co., Inc. (Laur & Mack), as general contractor for the construction of a motel in Niagara Falls. In the amended complaint, Laur & Mack alleges that it completed the contract work and is entitled to final payment of the amount due pursuant to the contract. It is undisputed, however, that the architect, third-party defendant, has not issued a certificate of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- BIB Construction Co. v. City of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Pile Foundation Construction Co. v. BergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Livingston v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- Scalp & Blade, Inc. v. Advest, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Village of Palmyra v. Hub Langie Paving, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Greece Central School District v. Tetra Tech Engineers, Architects & Landscape Architects, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Dillon v. Peak Envtl., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- J&A Concrete Corp. v. Dobco Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.