Legal Opinion
Fuchs v. Aronoff
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 26, 1946No. 348PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
This was a suit for attorney’s fees based upon plaintiff’s representation of defendants in connection with the purchase of a liquor business, the obtaining of a Class “A” retailer’s liquor license, and other related services. Defendants filed an answer admitting the employment of plaintiff and the completion of the services for which he was engaged but claiming the fee charged was excessive. The case was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $1,500.
Defendants have appealed and assign four errors by the trial court: (1) The sustaining…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Forsyth v. DoolittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ingersoll v. Coal Creek Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Davis v. Swedish-American National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Sullivan v. BrabasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kinard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- O'Brien v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Mann v. Robert C. Marshall, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- United Insurance Company v. NicholsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Maltby v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.