Legal Opinion

Farwell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 17, 1930No. 5PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

Since each of these notes was part of a special written agreement made by the parties at the time they were given, the estate of Lizzie W. Langdon, which was named as one of the payees, could not collect them except in accordance with the provisions of the special agreement. In Burke v. Dulaney, 153 U. S. 228, 14 S. Ct. 816, 38 L. Ed. 698, Storey v. Storey (C. C. A.) 214 F. 973, and other cases too numerous to make additional citation worth while, it was held that the conditional delivery of a note could be shown by parol. Here it is shown by the papers…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Matter of FlaglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Sparhawk v. Administrator of Ozias BuellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1837
  4. Probate Court v. SlasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
  5. Montpelier Seminary v. Smith's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Christiansen v. ChristiansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. In Re Guardianship of BriceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. HoeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. In Re DenissonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Sheneman v. ManringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API