Legal Opinion

Paul Arpin Van Lines v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1992No. 2259 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRY, Senior Judge.

Paul Arpin Van Lines (Arpin) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (the Board) which reversed in part and affirmed in part a referee’s decision which awarded Richard Selvey (Selvey) benefits. The referee had awarded Selvey benefits but had determined that George W. Weaver & Son, Inc. (Weaver) was the responsible employer. On appeal, the Board affirmed the award of benefits but determined that Arpin was the responsible employer.

Arpin presents two issues in its appeal. Initially, Arpin argues the Board erred in its determination that Arpin, rather…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canterna v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Monaci v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Daily Express, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Accountemps v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. JFC Temps, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Mullins v. Sun Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. JJ White, Inc. v. K. Yahawi (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API