Legal Opinion
Arvida Corporation v. Honorable Sidney Sugarman, United States District Judge, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arvida Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 2, 1958No. 25345-25347PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
The petition for mandamus is denied as moot. The merits relating to the application for a preliminary injunction are now being heard before the district court. For this reason there is no need of appellate decision as to the temporary restraining order or the order which vacated it.
2Cited by16 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Martin Frank, and Nylo-Thane Plastics Corp., Maurice Minuto, Olanda Minuto, Louis Braunston, Leonard FreedmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Lummus Company v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., Lummus Company v. Honorable Archie O. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- In the Matter of Vuitton Et Fils S.ACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- William Sustin v. Irving B. AltmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Video Tutorial Services, Inc. v. MCI Telecommunications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.