Legal Opinion

Peck v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 1992PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on or about March 2, 1992, which denied petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant to CPLR article 86, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from an order of said court and Justice, entered March 31, 1992, denying petitioner’s motion to "reargue and/or renew” is deemed one to reargue, and is unanimously dismissed as nonappealable, without costs.

Preliminarily, it should be noted that CPLR article 86 is in derogation of the common law in that it shifts to the State the obligation for the payment of counsel fees in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Nauss v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Chasanoff Operating Co. v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fiala v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Scibilia v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Hickey v. SinnottNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Sin Hang Lee v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. 2421 Realty Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API