State v. Darby
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
The main issue in this case is whether that portion of an admission against penal interest by an accomplice that implicated the defendant was admissible in defendant’s trial as an exception to the hearsay rule. We hold that it was not and reverse.
On December 15, 1977, David Miller, a salesman and departmental manager at the Woolco Department Store located on East Broadway in Tucson, Arizona, observed a male and female, both black, in the area where he was showing television games. The female, later identified as 15-year-old Beverly Thomas, took a television game and placed it in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- People v. LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Crowder v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- People v. SalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. ModicaHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. CruzArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. CruzArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. YslasArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HelmickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ParrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.