Legal Opinion
RSM, Incorporated v. Buckles
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 6, 2001No. 00-1777PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge WILLIAMS joined.
OPINION
WILKINSON, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs challenge a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (“BATF”) letter requiring federal firearms licensees to submit certain record information to BATF. The district court held that the letter violated Section 106 of the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C. § 926(a) (1994). RSM, Inc. v. Buckles, 94 F.Supp.2d 692 (D.Md.2000). Because BATF’s issuance of the letter was limited to federal firearms licensees who had violated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Donovan v. Lone Steer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jem Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Gayla Joy Hendren, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rsm, Incorporated v. Bradley BucklesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001