Legal Opinion

Barndollar v. Patton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to County Court of Pueblo County. -The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

It is assigned for error, first: that the second summons was-issued more than thirty days after the filing of the complaint.’ Sec. 30 of the Code provides that at any time within one month after the filing of the complaint the plaintiff may have a summons issued. This clearly refers to the summons first issued in the case. The Code makes no provision for an alias summons. The Supreme Court of California, in considering a like feature of the Code of that State, in the case of Dupuy v. Shear, 29 Cal. 240, say: “ A technical alias summons is not known to our law, and in fact, under our system of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dupuy v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Higley v. PollockNevada Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hill v. Fruita Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Myers v. MyersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. Inland Finance Co. v. Standard Salmon Packers, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1924
  5. In re Francis Levy Outfitting Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API