Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Willett Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1951No. 31312PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fueton

delivered the announcement of the court:

Pursuant to the order entered by the United States; Supreme Court in the cause of City of Chicago v. The Willett Company, (No. 493, October term, 1950, of said court,) requesting a clarification of our opinion in the same cause, reported in 406 Ill. 286, as to whether or not a decision of a Federal question was necessary, the basis for the opinion in said cause is as follows:

Osborne v. Florida, 164 U.S. 650, and Pullman Co. v. Adams, 189 U.S. 420, hold that only when a separation, in fact, of intrastate and interstate business exists a like separation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Osborne v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. New York Ex Rel. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Pullman Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. City of Chicago v. the Willett Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Telephone News System, Inc. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
  2. City of Chicago v. Willett Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. City of Chicago v. Willett Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1953
  4. City of Chicago v. Willett Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Telephone News System, Inc. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API