Legal Opinion

Walker v. Common Council

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1932No. Calendar 36,535PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiffs in this mandamus proceeding are the members of the board of jury commissioners for the recorder’s court for the city of Detroit, appointed under Act No. 330, Pub. Acts 1931. Section 1 provides: “This act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘municipal court jury code.’ ” The commissioners filed claims with the controller of the city of Detroit for compensation due each of them for their respective services, a claim for compensation for services rendered to the commission by a typist, and also claims for certain office supplies, office furniture and typewriters, such supplies and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burke v. City of River RougeMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Attorney General ex rel. Cotter v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Balch v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wayne Circuit Judges v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Sturgis v. County of AlleganMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API