Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 24, 1987Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAND DELIVERED

Mr. Chris Thomas Judicial Department Justice Building Little Rock, AR 72201

Dear Chris:

Today you have requested an opinion regarding whether an irreconcilable conflict exists between provisions of Act 442 and Act 474 of 1987. If such conflict does exist, you ask, which Act's provisions would prevail.

Act 442 of 1987 requires motor vehicle operators in Arkansas to have liability insurance. Any person violating the Act, it states:

[S]hall be fined no less than two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00). Nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) and such minimum fine shall be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pace v. State Use Saline County.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  2. Benton v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Cordell v. KentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Faver v. GoldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. Pope v. City of NashvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API