Legal Opinion

Featherstone v. Hendrick

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 5, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit.—Payee v. Guarantor, etc. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

The appellee held, as payee thereof, three promissory notes for $1,000 each, which matured respectively four, eight and twelve months after November 30, 1889. The notes were made by one Miner Ball, and represented the purchase price of sixteen mules and one horse bought of the appellee by Ball. At the time of mailing the purchase and giving the notes, Ball executed to appellee a chattel mortgage on the same property as security.

About the time the first note matured, the appellant, in consideration that appellee would extend the time of the payment of said first note another four months, wrote…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kingsland v. KoeppeIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Phares v. BarbourIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Klein v. CurrierIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Waite v. DennisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Webbe v. Romona Oolitic Stone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blakely Printing Co. v. BarnardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  2. Matson ex rel. Stearnes Co. v. City Market Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  3. Holmes v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API