Legal Opinion · Dissent

Joseph C. Daniel, Jr. v. Hugh Waters, Chairman, Textbook Commission of the State of Tennessee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1975No. 74-2230Published

1DissentCelebrezze, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent because I do not interpret the Supreme Court’s remand order as a holding that Tennessee’s biology textbook law is patently unconstitutional. The Supreme Court’s order was as follows:

The judgment is vacated and the ease is remanded to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee so that it may enter a fresh judgment from which a timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals.

*493This is not a holding that no three-judge District Court was necessary because this state statute is patently unconstitutional,” as the majority interprets the remand…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API