Legal Opinion

Petition of Variable for Change of Name v. Nash

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2008No. 28,488PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRY, Judge.

{1} Petitioner appeals the denial of his name change request. In our notice, we proposed to affirm. Petitioner has timely responded. Not persuaded by his arguments, we affirm.

{2} Petitioner filed a request in district court to change his name to “Fuck Censorship!” The district court denied the request stating that the “proposed name change would be obscene, offensive and would not comport with common decency.” This denial is consistent with our view as stated in In re Mokiligon, 2005-NMCA-021, ¶ 3, 137 N.M. 22, 106 P.3d 584, that courts may deny a name-change request when…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Lee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. In Re Snaphappy Fishsuit Mokiligon for Change of NameNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. In re RiveraCivil Court of the City of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. C. G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. C. G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API