Petition of Variable for Change of Name v. Nash
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} Petitioner appeals the denial of his name change request. In our notice, we proposed to affirm. Petitioner has timely responded. Not persuaded by his arguments, we affirm.
{2} Petitioner filed a request in district court to change his name to “Fuck Censorship!” The district court denied the request stating that the “proposed name change would be obscene, offensive and would not comport with common decency.” This denial is consistent with our view as stated in In re Mokiligon, 2005-NMCA-021, ¶ 3, 137 N.M. 22, 106 P.3d 584, that courts may deny a name-change request when…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- In Re Snaphappy Fishsuit Mokiligon for Change of NameNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re RiveraCivil Court of the City of New York · 1995
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. C. G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. C. G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2022