Legal Opinion · Dissent

Air Express International Agency, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 1, 1964No. 68592; protest 63/6044-16529 (New Orleans)Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Richabdson, Judge:

This case was filed by the importer of record, Air Express International Agency, Inc., a customs broker corporation. The plaintiff is not represented by anyone in this proceeding. Mr. Rudolph Heitler, an individual who is not an attorney, but a member of a partnership, San Pedro Coconut Co., for whose account plaintiff entered the merchandise, seeks to represent his partnership in this proceeding.

Rule 9 of the United States Customs Court provides:

Parties may appear and manage their eases personally or by attorney duly admitted under the rules of the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. S. Stern, Henry & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Stern v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API