Legal Opinion

People v. Zerbst

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1989PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed for the reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as concluded that the evidence adduced at trial from both victims was sufficient to corroborate the defendant’s confession (147 AD2d 844, 845-846).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ZerbstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. People v. ByronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. SargentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. BerlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API