Legal Opinion

Application of Rudolph S. Bley

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 5, 1964No. Patent Appeal 7215Published

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

Rudolph S. Bley appeals from a decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of all of the claims in appellant’s application 1 for a process, of spinning viscose rayon yarn. Claims. 7, 8, 9, 10 and 12, which are directed to-a process of producing high tenacity regenerated cellulose by extruding unripened viscose containing a spinning modifier into a spin bath containing aluminum sulfate, were rejected as unpatentableover the prior art.

In claims 7, 8 and 9 the unripened viscose is characterized by its salt point and in claims 10 and 12 by its degree of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mathieson Alkali Works, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Application of SuttonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API